Is 792 a prime number?
It is possible to find out using mathematical methods whether a given integer is a prime number or not.
For 792, the answer is: No, 792 is not a prime number.
The list of all positive divisors (i.e., the list of all integers that divide 792) is as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 18, 22, 24, 33, 36, 44, 66, 72, 88, 99, 132, 198, 264, 396, 792.
For 792 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 792 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Find out more:
As a consequence:
- 792 is a multiple of 1
- 792 is a multiple of 2
- 792 is a multiple of 3
- 792 is a multiple of 4
- 792 is a multiple of 6
- 792 is a multiple of 8
- 792 is a multiple of 9
- 792 is a multiple of 11
- 792 is a multiple of 12
- 792 is a multiple of 18
- 792 is a multiple of 22
- 792 is a multiple of 24
- 792 is a multiple of 33
- 792 is a multiple of 36
- 792 is a multiple of 44
- 792 is a multiple of 66
- 792 is a multiple of 72
- 792 is a multiple of 88
- 792 is a multiple of 99
- 792 is a multiple of 132
- 792 is a multiple of 198
- 792 is a multiple of 264
- 792 is a multiple of 396
For 792 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 792 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Is 792 a deficient number?
No, 792 is not a deficient number: to be deficient, 792 should have been such that 792 is larger than the sum of its proper divisors, i.e., the divisors of 792 without 792 itself (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 9 + 11 + 12 + 18 + 22 + 24 + 33 + 36 + 44 + 66 + 72 + 88 + 99 + 132 + 198 + 264 + 396 = 1 548).
In fact, 792 is an abundant number; 792 is strictly smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 9 + 11 + 12 + 18 + 22 + 24 + 33 + 36 + 44 + 66 + 72 + 88 + 99 + 132 + 198 + 264 + 396 = 1 548). The smallest abundant number is 12.