Is 834 a prime number?
It is possible to find out using mathematical methods whether a given integer is a prime number or not.
For 834, the answer is: No, 834 is not a prime number.
The list of all positive divisors (i.e., the list of all integers that divide 834) is as follows: 1, 2, 3, 6, 139, 278, 417, 834.
For 834 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 834 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Find out more:
As a consequence:
- 834 is a multiple of 1
- 834 is a multiple of 2
- 834 is a multiple of 3
- 834 is a multiple of 6
- 834 is a multiple of 139
- 834 is a multiple of 278
- 834 is a multiple of 417
For 834 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 834 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Is 834 a deficient number?
No, 834 is not a deficient number: to be deficient, 834 should have been such that 834 is larger than the sum of its proper divisors, i.e., the divisors of 834 without 834 itself (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 6 + 139 + 278 + 417 = 846).
In fact, 834 is an abundant number; 834 is strictly smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 6 + 139 + 278 + 417 = 846). The smallest abundant number is 12.