Is 648 a prime number?
It is possible to find out using mathematical methods whether a given integer is a prime number or not.
For 648, the answer is: No, 648 is not a prime number.
The list of all positive divisors (i.e., the list of all integers that divide 648) is as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 18, 24, 27, 36, 54, 72, 81, 108, 162, 216, 324, 648.
For 648 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 648 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Find out more:
As a consequence:
- 648 is a multiple of 1
- 648 is a multiple of 2
- 648 is a multiple of 3
- 648 is a multiple of 4
- 648 is a multiple of 6
- 648 is a multiple of 8
- 648 is a multiple of 9
- 648 is a multiple of 12
- 648 is a multiple of 18
- 648 is a multiple of 24
- 648 is a multiple of 27
- 648 is a multiple of 36
- 648 is a multiple of 54
- 648 is a multiple of 72
- 648 is a multiple of 81
- 648 is a multiple of 108
- 648 is a multiple of 162
- 648 is a multiple of 216
- 648 is a multiple of 324
For 648 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 648 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Is 648 a deficient number?
No, 648 is not a deficient number: to be deficient, 648 should have been such that 648 is larger than the sum of its proper divisors, i.e., the divisors of 648 without 648 itself (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 9 + 12 + 18 + 24 + 27 + 36 + 54 + 72 + 81 + 108 + 162 + 216 + 324 = 1 167).
In fact, 648 is an abundant number; 648 is strictly smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 9 + 12 + 18 + 24 + 27 + 36 + 54 + 72 + 81 + 108 + 162 + 216 + 324 = 1 167). The smallest abundant number is 12.