Is 828 a prime number?
It is possible to find out using mathematical methods whether a given integer is a prime number or not.
For 828, the answer is: No, 828 is not a prime number.
The list of all positive divisors (i.e., the list of all integers that divide 828) is as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, 23, 36, 46, 69, 92, 138, 207, 276, 414, 828.
For 828 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 828 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Find out more:
As a consequence:
- 828 is a multiple of 1
- 828 is a multiple of 2
- 828 is a multiple of 3
- 828 is a multiple of 4
- 828 is a multiple of 6
- 828 is a multiple of 9
- 828 is a multiple of 12
- 828 is a multiple of 18
- 828 is a multiple of 23
- 828 is a multiple of 36
- 828 is a multiple of 46
- 828 is a multiple of 69
- 828 is a multiple of 92
- 828 is a multiple of 138
- 828 is a multiple of 207
- 828 is a multiple of 276
- 828 is a multiple of 414
For 828 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 828 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Is 828 a deficient number?
No, 828 is not a deficient number: to be deficient, 828 should have been such that 828 is larger than the sum of its proper divisors, i.e., the divisors of 828 without 828 itself (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 9 + 12 + 18 + 23 + 36 + 46 + 69 + 92 + 138 + 207 + 276 + 414 = 1 356).
In fact, 828 is an abundant number; 828 is strictly smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 9 + 12 + 18 + 23 + 36 + 46 + 69 + 92 + 138 + 207 + 276 + 414 = 1 356). The smallest abundant number is 12.