Is 300 a prime number?
It is possible to find out using mathematical methods whether a given integer is a prime number or not.
For 300, the answer is: No, 300 is not a prime number.
The list of all positive divisors (i.e., the list of all integers that divide 300) is as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 50, 60, 75, 100, 150, 300.
For 300 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 300 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Find out more:
Actually, one can immediately see that 300 cannot be prime, because 5 is one of its divisors: indeed, a number ending with 0 or 5 has necessarily 5 among its divisors. The last digit of 300 is 0, so it is divisible by 5 and is therefore not prime.
As a consequence:
- 300 is a multiple of 1
- 300 is a multiple of 2
- 300 is a multiple of 3
- 300 is a multiple of 4
- 300 is a multiple of 5
- 300 is a multiple of 6
- 300 is a multiple of 10
- 300 is a multiple of 12
- 300 is a multiple of 15
- 300 is a multiple of 20
- 300 is a multiple of 25
- 300 is a multiple of 30
- 300 is a multiple of 50
- 300 is a multiple of 60
- 300 is a multiple of 75
- 300 is a multiple of 100
- 300 is a multiple of 150
For 300 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 300 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Is 300 a deficient number?
No, 300 is not a deficient number: to be deficient, 300 should have been such that 300 is larger than the sum of its proper divisors, i.e., the divisors of 300 without 300 itself (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 10 + 12 + 15 + 20 + 25 + 30 + 50 + 60 + 75 + 100 + 150 = 568).
In fact, 300 is an abundant number; 300 is strictly smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 10 + 12 + 15 + 20 + 25 + 30 + 50 + 60 + 75 + 100 + 150 = 568). The smallest abundant number is 12.