Is 288 a prime number?
It is possible to find out using mathematical methods whether a given integer is a prime number or not.
For 288, the answer is: No, 288 is not a prime number.
The list of all positive divisors (i.e., the list of all integers that divide 288) is as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12, 16, 18, 24, 32, 36, 48, 72, 96, 144, 288.
For 288 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 288 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Find out more:
As a consequence:
- 288 is a multiple of 1
- 288 is a multiple of 2
- 288 is a multiple of 3
- 288 is a multiple of 4
- 288 is a multiple of 6
- 288 is a multiple of 8
- 288 is a multiple of 9
- 288 is a multiple of 12
- 288 is a multiple of 16
- 288 is a multiple of 18
- 288 is a multiple of 24
- 288 is a multiple of 32
- 288 is a multiple of 36
- 288 is a multiple of 48
- 288 is a multiple of 72
- 288 is a multiple of 96
- 288 is a multiple of 144
For 288 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 288 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Is 288 a deficient number?
No, 288 is not a deficient number: to be deficient, 288 should have been such that 288 is larger than the sum of its proper divisors, i.e., the divisors of 288 without 288 itself (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 9 + 12 + 16 + 18 + 24 + 32 + 36 + 48 + 72 + 96 + 144 = 531).
In fact, 288 is an abundant number; 288 is strictly smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (that is 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 9 + 12 + 16 + 18 + 24 + 32 + 36 + 48 + 72 + 96 + 144 = 531). The smallest abundant number is 12.